OSHA encourages both parties to voluntary resolve whistleblower cases and reach an agreement that meets their needs. Additional resources to assist the parties in reaching a settlement may be available through OSHA’s Alternative Dispute Resolution program.
Review and Approval of Settlement Agreements: OSHA is a party to or reviews and approves settlement agreements in whistleblower cases under the laws it enforces. OSHA will not enter into or approve a settlement agreement unless it determines that the parties are making the settlement knowingly and voluntarily, the settlement provides appropriate relief to the complainant, and the settlement does not undermine the whistleblower protection law.
OSHA Standard Settlement Agreement: Whenever possible, the parties should use the OSHA standard settlement agreement. However, the parties may negotiate their own settlement agreement and submit it for OSHA’s approval.
OSHA Will NOT Approve An Agreement
That Contains Any of the Following:
- A provision that states or implies that OSHA or DOL is party to a confidentiality agreement.
- A “gag” provision that prohibits, restricts, or discourages an employee from participating in protected activity. Although a complainant may waive the right to recover future or additional compensation for retaliation that occurred prior to the date of the settlement agreement, a complainant cannot waive the right to provide information to a government agency, participate in investigations, testify in proceedings, or file a complaint about a condition or violation of law, regardless of when that condition or violation of law occurred.
- A provision that waives a complainant’s right to receive or fully retain a monetary award from a government-administered whistleblower award program for providing information to a government agency.
- A waiver of future employment that OSHA determines is overly restrictive based on the criteria described in the Whistleblower Investigations Manual.
OSHA may also refuse to approve additional terms that it finds are inconsistent with the protections of its whistleblower laws.